AdvertiseDonate
LatestNvidia CEO Affair Triggers Scrutiny of China's State Security Ministry
New Business Picks · 400 Corporate Pointe, Suite 300, Culver City, CA 90230
Politics · Los Angeles

Senate Faces Permitting Bill as Midterm Shifts Complicate Passage

A bipartisan energy package heads to a procedural vote Monday, but new Democratic strength in Congress has sparked debate over whether to proceed with the legislation now.

By Andrew Bennett ·

Illustration for: Senate Faces Permitting Bill as Midterm Shifts Complicate Passage
Illustration generated for this article, not a news photograph.

The Senate is set to hold a procedural vote on Monday regarding a bipartisan bill that would overhaul federal permitting rules for energy infrastructure. This action marks the first major legislative move following last week's midterm elections, which resulted in a decisive victory for Democrats and a repudiation of President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans.

The legislation aims to shorten the timeline for starting large energy projects, including both clean energy and fossil fuel developments. It also includes provisions requiring data centers to pay for the electricity they consume. Senators and the White House have pushed the measure as a solution to yearslong delays in grid expansion and rising power demands driven by artificial intelligence infrastructure.

President Trump urged senators to support the bill on Sunday, describing it in a social media post as a "BIG WIN for U.S. ENERGY INDEPENDENCE and DOMINANCE." He argued the bill would allow the U.S. to build pipelines, mines, and power plants faster, thereby lowering energy costs for families. Major industry groups, including the American Petroleum Institute and the American Clean Power Association, also back the package.

However, the bill faces opposition from environmental organizations and some Democrats who argue it weakens safeguards. The Sierra Club and National Wildlife Federation criticized the measure for limiting judicial review and altering the National Environmental Policy Act and Endangered Species Act. Sara Amundson of the Humane World Action Fund stated that the bill weakens the scientific foundation for protecting at-risk species.

The four Senate sponsors, Republican Sens. Shelley Moore Capito and Mike Lee and Democratic Sens. Martin Heinrich and Sheldon Whitehouse, released a set of amendments on Saturday to address some concerns. Heinrich said the revised version requires federal agencies to consult with tribes on projects affecting cultural sites and extends the window for state objections. Whitehouse noted that a provision in the bill would end the administration's practice of using public funds to buy out offshore wind leases.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who is expected to become speaker in January, criticized the bill last week. His office stated the legislation "falls short" in several areas. Some Democrats argue the party should use its stronger position in the next Congress to pass more targeted clean energy laws rather than this broader permitting package. Bradley Campbell of the Conservation Law Foundation called proceeding with the bill in the current Congress a "terrible mistake," arguing it strips power from federal agencies and communities.

Whitehouse described the bill as the floor of climate aspirations rather than the ceiling. He said he looks forward to working with the new Democratic majorities next year to accomplish bigger goals. The bill is expected to move toward a vote in the House if it passes the Senate.

More Politics · Report a business · Got a Story?

Get New Business Picks in your inboxThe best of business and city life. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.

Get New Business Picks in your inboxThe best of business and city life. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.